Is Lawrentz Frizelgard the cause of Aliens !

Extreme Time Dilation: How Would a Near-Light-Speed Traveler Experience Earth’s Future?

We already observe time dilation effects in GPS satellites, cosmic ray muons, and high-energy particles at CERN. 

Now let’s take a thought experiment:  

It's the year 2100... A group of interplanetary explorers whom have genetically modified themselves to withstand the rigors of space, embarks on a 10 year cosmic journey at 0.9999999 c. 


But when they return, Earth has aged over 220 000 years.

What’s interesting is that, from their frame of reference, nothing seems unusual—their biological aging and onboard clocks function normally.

But when they land, civilizations have completely changed. They would be the  relics of a long-forgotten past. No records of that past civilisation have  survived the sands of time.

The people on planet earth might see them as Aliens.

Could this be the real future of interstellar travel? Instead of making contact with alien civilizations, will humanity's first deep-space explorers become aliens on their own planet?

What would be the best way to describe this, from a relativistic point of view? Can we break this down using the full Lorentz Transformation to understand how both frames reconcile this? 


Lorentz factor γ :
 = 2236.07
Time elapsed on Earth :
 = γ . 100 years = 223,607 years

So, while the space explorer experiences 100 years, Earth has  experienced about 223,607 years...

So what should they do now...

If the civilisation they come back into, is an advanced civilisation, they might receive a guided missile welcome... 

If so, they probably will have to set base somewhere else...

On the other hand, if the people on planet earth are still worshiping the sun god Amun-Ra... 

I think I have an idea...

Ly DeSandaru.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The DONX Framework &
The Dimensional Closure Principle :
A Counter-Cantorian Approach to Infinite Sets via Eℕ

Image
1. Introduction The nature and hierarchy of infinite sets have fascinated mathematicians since Georg Cantor’s foundational work in the late 19th century. Cantor’s revolutionary theory introduced the concept of different sizes, or cardinalities, of infinity - notably distinguishing the countably infinite set of natural numbers, denoted ℕ, from the uncountably infinite set of real numbers, ℝ. This distinction rests on the fundamental insight that while ℕ can be put into a one-to-one correspondence with any of its infinite subsets, no such correspondence can exist between ℕ and ℝ. Cantor’s diagonalization argument formally proves the uncountability of ℝ, establishing a strict hierarchy of infinities with ℝ being strictly “larger” than ℕ. However, classical set theory inherently assumes that every element of ℕ is a finite natural number, possessing a finite representation - for example, a finite string of digits in base 10. This assumption aligns well with our standard, intuitive unders...
Read more

A New Perspective on Infinity via a 2D Hilbert Hotel

Image
Challenging Cantor: A New Perspective on Infinity via a 2D Hilbert Hotel Synopsis Part I: Georg Cantor's diagonal argument is widely used in Set Theory, to demonstrate the uncountability of real numbers. However, a critical examination reveals potential flaws in its logic. This article presents a compelling alternative perspective, using a "2D Hilbert Hotel" analogy to visualize the relationship between natural and real numbers, offering a more intuitive perspective of infinite cardinalities. [Def : Any set X that has the same cardinality as the set of the Natural numbers, or  |  X | = | ℕ | = ℵ 0 is defined as a countably infinite set .] In-Depth Detail: Introduction: Georg Cantor's diagonal argument is widely used in literature as a proof of the uncountability of real numbers, establishing that the set of real numbers is a "larger" infinity than the set of natural numbers.  (Note: This diagonal argument was a simplified approach to this validation, which...
Read more

Testing Feasibility of FTL Data Communication via Quantum Entanglement

  Synopsis: As per current mainstream physics... Physical phenomenon needs to satisfy: 1. Principle of Locality 2. No-Communication Theorem 3. Speed of light in a vacuum is a constant c Thus under these postulates principles and theorems, it would be infeasible to transfer information faster than the speed of light. The following experimental setup would attempt to verify / challenge  the validity of this constraint via attempting to transfer information via entangled particles. I do agree that this is a preposterous proposition, but do hear me out... Specially with the results of Bell Inequality Experiments, it is now evident that the correlation between entangled particles is near instantaneous (aka the correlation does occur faster than the speed of light). Thus... [17 Nov 2025 Note : The following would probably not work apparently due to the entanglement between the particles breaking / decoherence , in the process...] Experimental Setup: A particle generator (placed b...
Read more